Alterations of LRH's Technology
When it comes to LRH Standard Tech Scientologists know and agree that it must not under any circumstances be changed or altered in any way. When we buy services in a Scientology Org or Mission we expect it to be 100% Standard Tech. Unfortunately this is not anymore to be found in Church of Scientology.
Well, there is certainly Tech, and a some of it is pure, but tremendous amounts of changes has been made since LRH died in January 1986. Case gains (personal wins and improvements) are still produced to some degree, particularly on intro services and lower levels, otherwise the Church would not be able to survive and sustain it's business. But if you take a new look at KSW Series 1, you will find this quote: "The only thing you can be upbraided for by students or pcs is "no results." Trouble spots occur only where there are "no results." Attacks from governments or monopolies occur only where there are "no results" or "bad results.""
Okay, we are all aware that there are plenty of enemies to Scientology. See this list of some of the court files. Ron himself was pretty open mouthed and created himself many enemies on that account, but the Church kept expanding under his leadership. And it kept expanding until beginning of the eighties. Then in 1981-82 a big crash of international stats. The Church's expansion stopped. What happened? Well, Ron withdrew from all management positions and a new management was put in place. That was the main event.
Now, how come that the Church is almost constantly under such enormous pressure?
If you have ever attended an IAS briefing, you will know that they give you some good news to start with, and then they tell you about all the court cases and trouble which needs to be handled. Usually donations to the IAS are obtained because fantastic amounts of dollars are needed to fight the enemies. Think about this! Have you ever experienced this? Well, take a look at KSW series 1 again. "Attacks from governments or monopolies occur only where there are "no results" or "bad results.""
According to this the correct why for all the attacks and court cases threatening the survival of the Church is "no results" or "bad results", and that's that. In order to achieve no results or bad results the Tech must be altered. In it's pure form and applied correctly it DOES give good results, it gives SPECTACULAR results.
Starting to research the situation from this viewpoint it soon became clear that this IS the correct why. The Tech has been altered to a degree where squirreling would be the most correct expression covering the Church's current activities.
Golden Age of Tech is a good example. Good or bad, it IS a new learning method, not developed by LRH. Like it or not, it was developed by David Miscavige and NOT LRH. And Scientologists around the world applauded it. And it was in fact very well presented "The blind leading the blind". But it does put emphasis on rote learning rather than conceptual understanding. If you have done the Student Hat course you will remember that LRH put his emphasis on conceptual understanding, and talks about the glib student being a result of rote learning. GAT definitely opens the door to robotic learning. As Scientologist we all failed to do seven "Hammering out of existence incorrect technology" and nine "Closing the door on any possibility of incorrect technology".
Int managment introduced a hidden data line. There is a Scientology Policy Directive "Issue Line for Source Data" in which it is explained that Ron left handwritten notes which are being compiled and issued as HCOB's and HCO PL's. But the problem is that you are not allowed to actually SEE the handwritten notes. People who demand seeing the actual notes are likely to be sendt to Ethics, Sec-check or are com-ev'ed. There are several examples of that. They are charged with acting in disrespect of Management. In other words Int Management can basically issue whatever they want and just say that it is based on LRH handwritten notes. You can never see the notes and thus a hidden dataline has been effectively established.
Here are a few good examples of altered tech:
Tech eval from Caspar De Rijk, Class IX, OT V, double Saint Hill Special Briefing Course Graduate, Solo C/S.
Heimdals account on the False Purpose Rundown http://www.dasdrittejahrtausend.de/FPRD-e.html